Tamil Leaders Accuse Government of Building Parallel Power Structure Through Praja Shakthi

Tamil Leaders Accuse Government of Building Parallel Power Structure Through Praja Shakthi


Share this post

A government-backed community mobilisation programme has emerged as a political flashpoint in Sri Lanka's Northern and Eastern Provinces, with elected officials, political parties, and civil society groups warning that the initiative undermines constitutional governance and threatens to erode Tamil political representation at the grassroots level.

The Praja Shakthi (People's Power) programme, launched by the National People's Power (NPP) government and presented as a poverty alleviation initiative, has drawn sharp criticism from Tamil political leadership who characterise it as a partisan structure designed to bypass elected local authorities.

Constitutional Concerns Mount

The Ilankai Tamil Arasu Kachchi (ITAK), the largest Tamil political party, cited the programme as a principal reason for boycotting President Anura Kumara Dissanayake during his recent visit to Jaffna.

"Work that should be carried out by elected local authorities cannot be undertaken by a party machinery masquerading as a development programme," said M. A. Sumanthiran, ITAK's Acting General Secretary. He argued that functions constitutionally assigned to local government bodies cannot be legitimately transferred to what he described as a party-controlled mechanism.

The Point Pedro Pradeshiya Sabha has formally rejected the programme through a council resolution.

Douglas Devananda, former minister and secretary-general of the Eelam People's Democratic Party (EPDP), warned that, rather than strengthening local councils, the initiative effectively transfers power from elected institutions to a party-controlled apparatus. "This could undermine local government bodies and weaken their authority," he said.

Filling a Political Vacuum

Critics point to a critical context: Provincial Councils in the Northern and Eastern Provinces have remained non-functional for years, creating an administrative vacuum that the central government now appears positioned to fill through party-linked structures.

Suresh Premachandran, spokesperson for the Tamil National Alliance (TNA), noted that local councils fall under the purview of Provincial Councils. "With Provincial Councils remaining non-functional, the government is using Praja Shakthi to fill the resulting administrative vacuum with party-linked structures," he said.

This institutional void has made Tamil-majority regions particularly vulnerable to what critics characterise as political engineering disguised as development work.

Parallel Administration Allegations

S. A. Jothilingam, a political analyst and lawyer who serves as Director of the Centre for Social Science Research, described Praja Shakthi as functioning as a parallel administrative structure in areas where the NPP lacks control over local government.

"This structure has been created specifically to undermine local government institutions in Tamil-majority areas," Jothilingam said at a media briefing in Jaffna. He alleged that Praja Shakthi leaders are selected by Janatha Vimukthi Peramuna (JVP) cadres—the Marxist party that forms the core of the NPP coalition—rather than elected by communities.

According to Jothilingam, only individuals loyal to the ruling party are appointed, circumventing democratic selection processes. He cited media reports indicating that when the President visits an area, Grama Niladharis (village officers), Samurdhi officers (a government poverty programme), and Praja Shakthi organisers are directed to mobilise public attendance.

"The JVP's long experience in grassroots mobilisation gives it a strategic advantage," Jothilingam acknowledged, "but Tamil political forces must recognise the long-term risks."

Strategic Grassroots Penetration

Local activists allege the programme represents a calculated effort to establish permanent grassroots networks with administrative influence in regions where the ruling coalition lacks electoral support.

"With the label of poverty alleviation, the government is constructing a party-controlled structure at the village level," said one local activist who requested anonymity. "This seriously undermines Sri Lanka's Constitution and electoral system."

The concern centres on whether Praja Shakthi organisers function as community development coordinators or as political operatives building partisan infrastructure at the most local level of governance.

Government's Position

The NPP government officially describes Praja Shakthi as a poverty-alleviation and community-development initiative targeting marginalised communities. The programme coordinates village-level development activities and community mobilisation through local organisers.

Government officials have not yet issued a detailed response to the specific constitutional and political objections raised by Tamil political parties and civil society groups.


Share this post

Be the first to know

Join our community and get notified about upcoming stories

Subscribing...
You've been subscribed!
Something went wrong
‘This Is Apartheid’: Mano Ganesan Calls for UN Intervention in Cyclone Relief

‘This Is Apartheid’: Mano Ganesan Calls for UN Intervention in Cyclone Relief

Tamil Progressive Alliance leader Mano Ganesan has appealed to the United Nations to intervene in what he characterised as the systematic exclusion of Hill Country plantation communities from Sri Lanka's post-disaster reconstruction programme following Cyclone Dithwa. In a meeting with UN Resident Coordinator Marc-André Franche at the UN office in Colombo, Mano Ganesan said the government's Rebuilding Sri Lanka housing scheme had failed to include plantation families displaced by the December c


Our Reporter

Our Reporter

“Balasingham Saw the End — Prabhakaran Believed He Was Invincible”: G. L. Peiris on Sri Lanka’s Failed Peace Process

“Balasingham Saw the End — Prabhakaran Believed He Was Invincible”: G. L. Peiris on Sri Lanka’s Failed Peace Process

G. L. Peiris was at the epicentre of Sri Lanka’s peace negotiations with the LTTE and occupied senior office under three successive governments during one of the most consequential phases of the conflict. In his new book, The Sri Lanka Peace Process: An Inside View, he revisits that period with the benefit of temporal distance and retrospective clarity. In this interview with Jaffna Monitor, Peiris confronts the charge that his narrative assumes the posture of a detached observer and explains w


Aruliniyan Mahalingam

Aruliniyan Mahalingam

Holy Support for a Controversial Cause: Clergy Back ‘Black Day’ Protest

Holy Support for a Controversial Cause: Clergy Back ‘Black Day’ Protest

Senior religious figures from the Tamil community have now lent their moral weight to a controversial and arguably ill-judged plan by Jaffna University students to observe Sri Lanka’s Independence Day on February 4 as a “Black Day” in the Northern and Eastern provinces. The Jaffna University Students’ Union has announced that it will stage demonstrations and mark February 4 — Sri Lanka’s Independence Day — as a Black Day and a day of protest. In preparation, student representatives recently pai


Our Reporter

Our Reporter

Gajendrakumar Rejects ITAK’s Right to Lead Kivul Oya Protest

Gajendrakumar Rejects ITAK’s Right to Lead Kivul Oya Protest

Tamil National People's Front (TNPF) President and Jaffna MP Gajendrakumar Ponnambalam has declared that the Ilankai Tamil Arasu Kachchi (ITAK) has no moral authority to lead protests against the government's Kivul Oya irrigation project, accusing the party of having previously facilitated the Sinhalisation of Tamil areas. Addressing a press conference in Jaffna, Ponnambalam argued that civil society organisations, rather than ITAK, should take the lead in organising resistance to the controver


Our Reporter

Our Reporter