Gajendrakumar Says LTTE Sought Ceasefire to Evacuate Civilians in Final Days of 2009 War

Gajendrakumar Says LTTE Sought Ceasefire to Evacuate Civilians in Final Days of 2009 War


Share this post

Tamil National People’s Front (TNPF) leader and Jaffna District MP Gajendrakumar Ponnambalam has made explosive revelations about the final days of Sri Lanka’s civil war, alleging that the Liberation Tigers of Tamil Eelam (LTTE) sought a humanitarian ceasefire to evacuate trapped civilians — but that the government instead intensified its military operations.

Mediator Between the LTTE and the Government

In a recent address, Gajendrakumar revealed that he personally acted as a mediator between the LTTE leadership and the Sri Lankan government during a critical 72-hour period between May 16 and 18, 2009, when an estimated 150,000 civilians were trapped in Mullivaikkal.

Political observers note that the MP had long remained silent about any such mediatory role. His revelation now appears to confirm long-standing speculation that he had been in contact with both parties during the war’s final phase.

White Flag Controversy

Several Tamil leaders, including fellow Tamil nationalist MP Sritharan, have previously accused Gajendrakumar of involvement in the controversial “white flag” incident, in which several LTTE leaders were killed while reportedly attempting to surrender.

Sritharan alleged that Gajendrakumar’s role as a mediator with the government may have facilitated the surrender and questioned his long silence on the matter. He also challenged Gajendrakumar to disclose his communications with British journalist Marie Colvin, who was reportedly involved in efforts to arrange the surrender, arguing that the public “deserves transparency” about his actions during those critical days.

Ceasefire Proposal

Detailing his version of events, Gajendrakumar said LTTE Political Wing Head S. Nadesan and Peace Secretariat Chief S. Pulithevan personally contacted him to convey their willingness to agree to a temporary ceasefire that would allow civilians to leave the war zone safely.

“The LTTE leadership told me they were ready for a ceasefire to ensure civilians could move to safety,” he said. “They asked me to convey this to Basil Rajapaksa, and I did. I am a witness to this.”

At the time, then–Economic Development Minister Basil Rajapaksa was handling government communications while President Mahinda Rajapaksa was overseas.

Government Response and Breakdown

According to Gajendrakumar, Basil Rajapaksa acknowledged the LTTE’s proposal, and the matter was later discussed at the National Security Council meeting following President Rajapaksa’s return on May 17.

“There was an understanding to allow a delegation, including the late Bishop of Mannar Rayappu Joseph, to enter LTTE-held areas and facilitate the safe evacuation of civilians,” he recalled. “These discussions were held around 8 p.m. on May 16.”

However, Gajendrakumar alleges that instead of facilitating civilian evacuation, the Sri Lankan military launched heavy artillery attacks on LTTE-controlled areas.

“Rather than enabling civilian evacuation, what took place was a mass killing of civilians within LTTE-controlled territory,” he claimed. “I personally witnessed these events. What happened was a massacre of Tamil civilians.”

Conflicting Accounts from Former LTTE Members

A few credible sources who spoke with Jaffna Monitor, including former LTTE leaders, confirmed that the LTTE did indeed seek a ceasefire — not only to evacuate civilians, but also as part of a broader arrangement that included the safe surrender of several top LTTE figures such as S. Nadesan, S. Pulithevan, Pulikalin Kural radio head Jawan (also known as Tamil Anban), LTTE police chief Ramesh (also known as Ilango), and others.

However, several parents whose children were brutally abducted by the LTTE’s abduction wing have accused Jawan and Ramesh of masterminding large-scale child conscription during the height of the war. Yet, they stress that nothing can justify the killing of children, women, or the leaders themselves, all of whom had surrendered to the army.

According to these sources, the negotiations involved Gajendrakumar and a few others. Under the deal, the government had allegedly agreed to accept the surrender of the LTTE leaders who would approach carrying white flags — but they were ultimately executed instead.

Fonseka’s Explosive Allegation

In a recent press conference, former Army Commander Field Marshal Sarath Fonseka stated that he has credible evidence proving that Gotabaya Rajapaksa, who was then Secretary to the Ministry of Defence and brother of President Mahinda Rajapaksa, had ordered Major General Shavendra Silva, then commander of the 58 Division, to eliminate those who came forward carrying white flags to surrender.

Endgame and Accountability

The final phase of Sri Lanka’s 26-year civil war ended on May 18, 2009, with the defeat of the LTTE. The closing weeks of the war remain highly contentious, with multiple reports — including those by the United Nations — documenting violations of international humanitarian law by both the Sri Lankan military and the LTTE.

The UN estimates that up to 40,000 Tamil civilians may have been killed in the war’s final months, though exact figures remain disputed.

Successive Sri Lankan administrations — including Mahinda Rajapaksa’s and those that followed — have consistently denied allegations of war crimes, maintaining that all military operations were conducted in compliance with international humanitarian law. However, international human rights bodies and independent observers continue to present evidence that contradicts those official claims.


Share this post

Be the first to know

Join our community and get notified about upcoming stories

Subscribing...
You've been subscribed!
Something went wrong
Why Tamil Politics Cannot Be a Pensioner's Hobby
A cut-out portrait of Judge M. Ilancheliyan from his farewell ceremony.

Why Tamil Politics Cannot Be a Pensioner's Hobby

If you trace the arc of Tamil political leadership from Independence to today, one pattern repeats with stubborn persistence: our fate has been decided almost exclusively by lawyers. From Sir Ponnambalam Ramanathan and G.G. Ponnambalam to Thanthai Chelva and Amirthalingam, and now to Sumanthiran and Gajendrakumar—the legal profession has monopolized Tamil political space for more than a century. Nothing personal against lawyers. But their craft is built on argument, narrative construction, and


Kaniyan Pungundran

Kaniyan Pungundran

Jaffna Swami
Picture produced using GPT-4 https://chat.openai.com

Jaffna Swami

Translated from the original Tamil short story yāḻppānaccāmi  (யாழ்ப்பாணச் சாமி)  by Shobasakthi. The original story is available at his website. If you have any questions or feedback, please contact ez.iniyavan@gmail.com. This story is not about the Aruḷampalam Swami who was immortalized in song by the great Tamil poet Bharathiyār, calling him the eye of the world and the enlightened vessel that delivers sinners from their suffering. I am about to tell you the story of a different Jaffna Swami


Eḻuttukkiṉiyavaṉ

Eḻuttukkiṉiyavaṉ

WE ARE SORRY

WE ARE SORRY

Editorial Thirty-Five Years of Silence, Thirty-Five Years of Shame On October 30, 1990 — thirty-five years ago — the Liberation Tigers of Tamil Eelam, with we Tamils as mute spectators, committed an atrocity that erased whatever moral or ethical ground our struggle once stood upon. In an orchestrated act of ethnic cleansing — not in scale, but in spirit comparable to the mass expulsion of the Rohingya from Myanmar; reminiscent of the 1948 Palestinian Nakba; echoing the forced displacement of


Kaniyan Pungundran

Kaniyan Pungundran

No Minority Politician Can Solve Ethnic Issues Without the Trust of the Majority: Faiszer Musthapha
Faiszer Musthapha

No Minority Politician Can Solve Ethnic Issues Without the Trust of the Majority: Faiszer Musthapha

At Jaffna Monitor, we believe that meaningful conversations about ethnic representation, national unity, and pluralistic governance are essential for Sri Lanka’s democratic future. For decades, ethnic politics has shaped — and often fractured — the country’s political landscape and the fate of its people. Yet critical questions remain unanswered: What is the most effective path for minority communities to secure their rights and interests? Should minority leaders work within majority-led nationa


Jaffna Monitor

Jaffna Monitor