Jaffna Court to Decide Gotabaya Rajapaksa Testimony in 2011 Disappearance Case

Jaffna Court to Decide Gotabaya Rajapaksa Testimony in 2011 Disappearance Case


Share this post

JAFFNA, Sri Lanka — A magistrate’s court in Jaffna has set April 28 as the date it will decide how former President Gotabaya Rajapaksa must provide testimony in the long-running case of two Tamil activists who vanished in 2011 amid allegations of enforced disappearance in the aftermath of Sri Lanka’s civil war.

Lalith Kumar Weeraraj and Kugan Muruganandan, members of the leftist Frontline Socialist Party and organizers of protests demanding justice for victims of enforced disappearances, were last seen on Dec. 9, 2011, leaving Mr. Muruganandan’s home in Avarangal, Jaffna, on a motorcycle. They disappeared the following day, Dec. 10 — International Human Rights Day — while preparing a demonstration in Jaffna to highlight abductions in the region.

A complaint was lodged at Achchuveli Police Station shortly afterward, and the matter was reported to the Mallakam Magistrate’s Court on Dec. 12, 2011. At the time, Gotabaya Rajapaksa was serving as defense secretary under his brother, President Mahinda Rajapaksa.

Lalith Kumar Weeraraj and Kugan Muruganandan, the two Front Line Socialist Party activists who disappeared in Jaffna in December 2011.
Lalith Kumar Weeraraj and Kugan Muruganandan, the two Front Line Socialist Party activists who disappeared in Jaffna in December 2011.

In 2012, relatives of the missing men filed a habeas corpus petition in the Court of Appeal in Colombo seeking information on their whereabouts. The appellate court directed the Jaffna Magistrate’s Court to examine witnesses connected to the alleged abduction and submit a report. Proceedings in Jaffna began in September 2012.

The case gained prominence in 2017 when Gotabaya Rajapaksa — who served as defense secretary from 2005 to 2015 during the final, brutal phase of Sri Lanka’s 26-year civil war — was named as a witness. Subsequently, the court ordered him to appear in Jaffna to testify, but his legal team informed the court that security concerns prevented him from traveling to the Tamil-majority north.

At a hearing in December 2025, the Jaffna court instructed Gotabaya Rajapaksa to submit an affidavit if he could not appear in person. The affidavit was filed, and both sides were directed to present written submissions on how his testimony should be recorded.

When the case was taken up last friday, the court announced that it would deliver its ruling on April 28. The decision is expected to determine whether testimony will be accepted via affidavit, video link, or another method.

Attorneys S. K. Puranthiran and Laksayan represented the families of Mr. Weeraraj and Mr. Muruganandan. Attorney Suranga Perera appeared for Gotabaya Rajapaksa.

The disappearance of Lalith Kumar Weeraraj and Kugan Muruganandan has come to symbolize the thousands of unresolved enforced disappearances that occurred during and after Sri Lanka’s civil war, which ended in 2009 with the defeat of the Liberation Tigers of Tamil Eelam. Human rights groups estimate that between 60,000 and 100,000 people went missing, the majority in the Tamil-dominated north and east. The United Nations and other international bodies have repeatedly called for credible investigations and accountability, citing persistent impunity for alleged perpetrators, including senior military and political figures.

Gotabaya Rajapaksa, who served as president from 2019 until he fled the country in July 2022 amid mass protests over an economic collapse, has consistently denied any involvement in enforced disappearances or other human rights violations during his time as defense secretary. The affidavit he submitted cited alleged security threats as the reason for not appearing in person in Jaffna.

Families of the disappeared and rights activists continue to hold protests across northern Sri Lanka, demanding answers about the fate of missing relatives. many cases have dragged on for more than a decade with little progress, fueling criticism that Sri Lanka’s judicial system has failed to deliver justice for wartime and postwar abuses.


Share this post

Be the first to know

Join our community and get notified about upcoming stories

Subscribing...
You've been subscribed!
Something went wrong
Sri Lankan Parliament Suspended After Chaotic Protest Over Judiciary Debate

Sri Lankan Parliament Suspended After Chaotic Protest Over Judiciary Debate

COLOMBO, Sri Lanka — Sri Lanka’s Parliament descended into disorder on Tuesday when opposition lawmakers protested the government’s refusal to allow an urgent debate on persistent judicial vacancies and a contentious proposal to extend the retirement age of senior judges, prompting the Speaker to suspend proceedings for 10 minutes. The confrontation began after opposition legislators, led by Ajith P. Perera of the Samagi Jana Balawegaya, pressed for immediate discussion of long-unfilled positio


Our Reporter

Our Reporter

U.S. Embassy Announces Transfer of 10 Helicopters to Sri Lanka Air Force
President Anura Kumara Dissanayake attends the induction of TH-57 Sea Ranger helicopters to the Sri Lanka Air Force alongside senior U.S. and Sri Lankan defense officials at Ratmalana Air Force Base on June 23, 2026.

U.S. Embassy Announces Transfer of 10 Helicopters to Sri Lanka Air Force

RATMALANA, Sri Lanka — The United States has transferred 10 TH-57 Sea Ranger (Bell 206) helicopters to the Sri Lanka Air Force, according to a press release issued by the U.S. Embassy in Colombo on Tuesday. The handover took place at Ratmalana Air Force Base in the presence of President Anura Kumara Dissanayake, U.S. Pacific Air Forces Commander General Kevin Schneider, and U.S. Assistant Secretary of State Paul Kapur, the embassy said. According to the U.S. Embassy, the helicopters were trans


Our Reporter

Our Reporter

Ex-Militants in Europe Question Maulana’s Easter Bombings Claims

Ex-Militants in Europe Question Maulana’s Easter Bombings Claims

By M.R. Narayan Swamy When Sivanesathurai Chandrakanthan alias Pillaiyaan was first told that his former aide Azad Maulana was planning to stir up some trouble from Europe, the former’s instant reaction was: “Really? What could it be about?” Pillaiyaan, a former chief minister of Sri Lanka’s Eastern Province, could only recall the mountain of difficulties Mohammed Hanzeer Mohammed Mihilar, alias Maulana, had been in due to his own family problems. The Amparai-born Maulana had apparently


M.R. Narayan Swamy

M.R. Narayan Swamy

The Padmanabha Massacre: The Killing That Foretold a Movement's Isolation

The Padmanabha Massacre: The Killing That Foretold a Movement's Isolation

By M.R. Narayan Swamy When EPRLF leader K. Pathmanabha was gunned down with 12 party colleagues (and two Indians) in Chennai in 1990, it was a clear signal that the LTTE was set to take individual terrorism to a new level even as it waged an armed struggle in Sri Lanka. Most unfortunately, the red flag was mostly ignored by the Indian state, Tamil Nadu politicians, and the larger Sri Lankan Tamil society. Most people in the Indian establishment and among Tamil Nadu leaders viewed the cold-bloo


M.R. Narayan Swamy

M.R. Narayan Swamy